Description of the Assessment Plan at New Mexico Junior College
Vision Statement 1 of the New Mexico Junior College Mission Statement states
that the college will
Provide the highest quality education and community services possible
by maintaining an educational environment where continuous assessment ensures
student learning.
The following information addresses the continuous assessment of student
learning on the course, departmental, and institutional level.
Course Level Assessment
During spring 2003, the OAC, with input from all faculty, developed institutional
outcomes (See Appendix A). The following fall, faculty completed a survey
indicating the degree (see box below) to which courses address these outcomes.
Degree of Delivery of Outcomes
Primary Course for Delivery of Stated Outcome:
- Major Outcome of Course (continuous development of desired outcome)
- Continuous Formal Assessment of Outcome
- Formal Feedback to Student
Secondary Course for Delivery of Stated Outcome:
- Reinforcement of Outcome (3-5 activities within the course)
- Continuous Formal or Informal Assessment of Outcome
- Formal or Informal Feedback to Student
Incidental Course for Delivery of Stated Outcome:
- Incidental Reinforcement of Outcome (1-2 small activities in the course)
- Informal Assessment of Outcome
- Possible Informal Feedback to Student
Summative and formative assessment strategies exist on the course level. As
shown in the next section, course level assessment is implemented through the
departmental assessment plan.
Documentation of assessment activities is reported on the departmental and
institutional levels.
The Departmental Assessment Plan
The Departmental Assessment Plan flows from the department’s mission
and is structured around
- determining department level outcomes that link back to the institutional
outcomes; and
- designing and implementing a long-range assessment plan that will focus
annually on a specific departmental outcome.
The Institutional Assessment Plan
The Institutional Assessment Plan is structured around
- gathering evidence of student learning for an institutional portfolio.
This evidence will demonstrate learning on three major institutional outcomes;
and
- scoring and analyzing the evidence using an institutional rubric that will
be adjusted to fit the actual evidence submitted.
DEPARTMENTAL ASSESSMENT PLAN
Assessment should be ongoing and systemic. By implementing a departmental
assessment plan, faculty determine their department’s learner outcomes,
develop and apply assessment strategies, and use the results for continuous
improvement of learning. The OAC adopted the following guidelines and process
for initiating a departmental assessment plan.
Characteristics of the Departmental Assessment Plan
The OAC recognizes that successful assessment plans:
- Involve input and discussion by all faculty.
- Develop around the department as a whole and allow the individual courses
to support the plan.
- Incorporate departmental mission statements supporting the mission statement
of the college.
- Focus on the most vital 4-6 learning outcomes (goals) for the department.
- Incorporate ongoing and flexible, long-range strategies.
- Embed multiple assessment activities in the normal course of class sessions,
department meetings, and in-service activities.
- Evolve in stages.
- Utilize all faculty (and consider external assessors) in the evaluation
of assessment results.
- Create meaningful conversations and positive changes based on assessment
results.
Logistics of the Departmental Assessment Plan

- Define the departmental mission statement.
- Develop the departmental learning outcomes (goals).
- Develop an initial long-range plan based on learning outcomes.
- Identify possible assessment methods. Evaluate and select appropriate methods.
- Determine outcomes to assess and define performance criteria.
- Develop a plan and timeline for carrying out the assessment.
- Implement the assessment.
- Evaluate the results.
- Determine an action plan based on the results.
- Document and communicate results with appropriate stakeholders.
************
INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT PLAN
The institutional portfolio consists of a collection and review of student
work (“artifacts”) produced throughout the curriculum for each of
our major outcomes. As with the departmental assessment plans, a continuing
process of gathering evidence, analyzing that evidence, and implementing improvements
is vital for making improvements in student learning.
As a first step, the OAC invites and encourages participation of faculty in
submitting classroom sets of student work which represents evidence of skills,
abilities or attitudes related to one or more institutional learning outcomes.
The long-term goal in gathering evidence is to have five classroom sets of artifacts
submitted for each outcome each year.
The next step in the portfolio process is the scoring of these artifacts by
faculty and professional staff teams using scoring rubrics. Results of the scoring
are compiled, analyzed, and reported in the aggregate. Analyses may include
breakdowns on variables such as credit hours earned, prior courses completed,
etc. The OAC reviews the results and reports to the faculty.
In this continuous process, the next step involves discussion and action among
faculty to develop a plan for improvements in student learning.
Characteristics of the Institutional Portfolio
- The scoring teams are multidisciplinary thus "responsibility" rests
with the institution/faculty as a whole, rather than single departments.
- The process is invisible to students, decreasing the motivation problems
and other significant problems sometimes associated with standardized tests.
- The process is minimally intrusive for faculty.
- The portfolio is a dynamic process—potentially forever growing, forever
improving.
Logistics of the Institutional Portfolio
- Office of Learning and Assessment and/or OAC selects courses based on responses
to an invitation to faculty.
- Faculty selects assignment(s) in each selected class.
- Office of Learning and Assessment copies artifacts before they are graded.
- Four-to-six person interdisciplinary faculty and professional staff teams
score the artifacts.
- Scoring takes place individually by team members after training has taken
place.
- Five classroom sets for each outcome are collected each year.
- Fall artifacts are scored in the spring. Spring and summer artifacts are
scored in the fall.
- Office of Learning and Assessment compiles results; OAC reviews the results
and presents a summary to faculty who propose curricular improvements.
:A Brief History:
:Statement on Assessment:
:Student Learning Outcomes:
:Process for the Departmental Assessment Plan:
:Process for Compiling the Institutional Portfolio:
:Outcomes Assessment Committee:
:Assessment Resources: